Competition: Making better beers and ultimately, better brewers.

Competing is hard for me. I strive to do everything perfectly. No flaws, no errors, no excuses. This is typical Type-A personality stuff, and everyone knows someone like me. I hate to lose, and I damn sure hate to admit that I lost because of my own efforts (or mistakes). But I also crave feedback. If something I built, wrote, said, designed, grilled, baked, painted, or brewed isn’t quite right, I want to know how to fix it next time around. This is the basic reason why brewing competitions are so awesome.

Who doesn’t want to win? I am a great winner! I am only an okay loser; sometimes I am crushed by not doing great at whatever I attempted. So when I entered my first homebrew competition in 2015 I was pretty excited to get some quality feedback about my beers. I entered three beers and two different wild fermented ciders in hopes of doing well and learning about the process. I was not disappointed, I did both well and utterly terrible at the same time.

The beers I had submitted were:

1)      A smoked version of my “BSP” porter (nitro) which I thought would do terrible because it was a nitro version and wouldn’t bottle well. (why no name here, since you offered names for the others?)

2)      My “Seastate Schwarzbier,” which I thought would do okay because it was almost indistinguishable from the best commercial example I had ever tried.

3)      My “Kings Bay Kolsch,” of which I was the so proud and sure that I fully expected to medal for this beer and put it in the “done column” on our brewery listing of experimental beers.

Before I tell you how I did, I need to explain how a beer is judged. Each beer is submitted under a style profile category—a no-brainer since an Irish Stout and an American IPA are completely different and cannot be compared. Judges are certified by the Beer Judge Certification Program (BCJP) and can be of varying levels of experience, and you have no way of knowing who will judge your beer. Each beer has a theoretical maximum point value of 50. The breakdown of points goes like this:

Aroma (0-12pts), Appearance (0-3pts), Flavor (0-20pts), Mouthfeel (0-5pts) and Overall Impression (0-10pts).

Total score then falls into these categories: A problematic beer (0-13), Fair (14-20), Good (21-29), Very Good (30-37), Excellent (38-44), Outstanding (45-50).  (Are the word descriptions here official? Because the scale, to me, seems skewed to favorable descriptions. Seems like the Good should be Fair, the Very Good should be Good, the Excellent should be Very Good, and there should be only one Outstanding/Excellent category)

So how did I do? I logged into the event website to see my scores (the score sheets would arrive several weeks later).Well my porter did about as well as I imagined. I had bottling issues because it was on nitro and I really didn’t know what I was doing, and it was an odd beer with both smoked malt and black strap molasses. I basically got killed in the category,scoring only 24 points. This was bad news, but not unexpected. Had I been able to pour this beer from the tap and hand it to a judge, I think it would have scored a few points higher.

My Kolsch, my pride and joy, scored only slightly higher at 28.6 points (left photo). I was heartbroken when I read the final scores on the event website. Then mad. I worked so hard, perfected my process after two or three batches, and all my friends and family loved it. How could it be so “off” according to the judges? (This is the part where I will remind you that I am only an “okay loser.”)

 Kolsch score sheetschwarzbier score sheetmy wooden medal

 

 

 

Several weeks passed before I got my scoresheets in the mail, and when I did, initial anger phase behind me, I took them to heart. This is the best part of competing for me. If you tell me what was out of style or incorrect, I can work on these items, making it better the next time. When you read the comments while looking at the scores, everything can become clearer. That said, beer judging is like watching television or choosing a font for your blog. Everybody has a favorite show or font, and it’s probably not the same as someone else’s favorite. These things are very subjective. Because of the subjectivity of beer tastes, entering the same beer into multiple competitions to be judged by multiple different judges – and palates – can show you a trend in judging and help you make better adjustments. Some of my comments were: “tastes like an okay kolsch, but the color and body are a bit off-style,” “slightly heavy for a kolsch, a bit creamy,” and “generally a good effort but the high astringency detracts from the overall drinkability, watch sparge temperatures/over sparging perhaps, keep at it!”

The comments, and encouragement were just what I needed. I learned a few huge lessons.

1)      My individual palate is awful at best. I cannot taste (or smell) at the level necessary to be a judge.

2)      My friends are drinking my beer for free, and that alone makes it “better” than it probably is.

3)      Kolsch is one of the hardest beers to get right. You are not covering it up with hops, dark malt or adjuncts, so any mistake in recipe, process or fermentation comes right through.

And that leaves the schwarzbier on the beer list (middle photo), so you’ve probably guessed this beer did really well. It finished first in its category (right photo), first for all lagers (1 of 4) and then 10th overall in the Best of Show round. I was completely shocked and very humbled. Once again, the feedback was great and I took it to heart and made a few more tweaks to my recipe in an attempt to make it even better.

So how did my Kolsch do in 2016? Once again, it was crushed. The differences from the kegged version to what was in the bottle were night and day. My feedback from the judges this year was good, and I have a lot of room to improve. So back to the drawing board with hopes of claiming a gold medal next time.

Sea State Schwarzbier

My infatuation with schwarzbier started years ago when in the Navy on my first Mediterranean deployment (“The Med”). Even though it was 1993 and the American craft brew industry was just starting to discover the ability to make beer that did not suck, Europe was (and still is) the obvious master of the European beer styles. I did not get to go to Germany proper, but I did drink every beer I could not pronounce or recognize. Some styles were obvious wins for me, others took years to enjoy (I still don’t like barley wine). I fell in love with the Czech lagers and pilsners, anything from Germany, and even some of the Dutch and Belgian beers. The ones that really stood out on my Rolling Rock-calibrated palate were the rich lagers and anything amber colored or darker.

Sea State

This is what a “heavy” sea state looks like. Sea States are numbered from 0-5, 5 being the roughest.

I know, I know, it is no huge surprise that the Germans brew killer lagers. But what did surprise me was that these dark beers could be so flavorful without any bitterness and without wandering into porter and stout territory. Schwarzbier has remained one of my favorite beer styles, despite its elusiveness in the American commercial market. This was a driving force behind my putting a recipe in motion and trying to figure it out.

Where to start? The first thing to overcome is controlling fermentation temperature. At the time I was putting the plan together, I had only two ways to control temperature. I could wait until the season here in New England was right, so my basement temperature would help keep my fermentation buckets and carboys in the 50-54°F range, or I could use my homebuilt “keezer” (aka kegerator) to get me in the temperature range. Either would be acceptable as I had already brewed several lagers using the “basement method” with reasonable success. The only issue with the basement method, is that the temperature can fluctuate high out of the acceptable range during the early fermentation. This affects the ability to reliably repeat the beer each time, which will obviously affect consistency. So for my schwartzbier, that meant we used the kegerator in order to control the temperature much more accurately.

How to formulate a recipe that would give you what you are looking for? Since I am reasonably new to the brewing hobby, I sought out a few sources. In my opinion, you should find a commercial example that you like. For me, that example was Kostritzer Schwarzbier. Not only was it something that I really love, it was actually German, and listed in the Beer Judge Certification Program (BJCP) guide as a good commercial example of the style (Dark European Lager, category 8B. It was not the top example though; that one was Devils Backbone Schwartz Bier, which is a VA company and also wonderful.) Once you know what you want it to end up tasting like, then you can research the “clones,” blogs, posted recipe resources, etc. I chose to use the example from Jamil Zainasheff’s podcast (The Jamil Show on The Brewing Network), which was based on his award-winning recipe in his book Brewing Classic Styles. I used the BJCP style guides and the malt bill percentages from Jamil’s show and came up with a recipe that finished at the higher end of the BJCP ranges for the style.

On that first brew day, everything went fairly well. I boiled for around 100 minutes to get great clarity and to minimize any dimethyl sulfide (DMS) from the pilsner malt. I then chilled the wort to 60°F and set my kegerator to 50°F (with 2°F variation). I had grown a good two-liter starter for my yeast (WLP830 “German Lager”), so I pitched the yeast in after oxygenating for a full minute. Primary fermentation was mostly completed in 7-10 days, so on the tenth day set the kegerator temperature to 62°F for the diacetyl rest for two additional days. For those not in the know, diacetyl is a mostly lager yeast byproduct that gives beer a “buttery” or butterscotch-like flavor and aroma. Lager yeast can reabsorb it at slightly warmer temperatures (if it was ever produced by the yeast). After this rest was completed, I then set the kegerator temperature to 50°F again and waited an additional two weeks before “crashing” to 36°F for two additional weeks and then transferring to secondary fermentation (aka “secondary”).

After a month in secondary, we carbonated at 13 psi for a week and I kept thinking about how it would turn out. Would it be anywhere close to what I had hoped? After that agonizing week of waiting, we put it on tap and were amazed at how well it turned out. It was clean, crisp, and the malt flavors came through as expected. The slightly roast character, combined with just enough noble hop bitterness, made it really interesting. The 4.8% ABV made it really drinkable, so much so, that we decided to bottle it within a few days so we would not drink it all before we could get it into competition.

We did enter this beer into the Ocean State Homebrew Competition, along with two wild fermented ciders, a smoked, nitro porter (BSP at Sea), and a Kolsch (Kings Bay Kolsch). It was our first competition, so we had the feeling it would be a bit of a bloodbath when it came to the scoring. In fact, it was a bloodbath for four of our five entries, which will be covered in other posts. But this beer did well, really, really well for the first competition.

For the first run of any new recipe, you know there will be adjustments with the grain bill, brewing or fermenting processes, or the packaging of the beer. We definitely took some of those hits with our other entries, but Seastate Schwarzbier scored 39.5 of a possible 50 points, winning the dark German lager category! This victory, while sweet, felt a little hollow as this was the only entry in the category. It was not until many weeks later that we realized that all the German lager categories were combined, so it was the best German lager period, which made us feel much better about that “gold medal.” As a category winner, the beer then competes in the Best of Show (BOS) round for the top spot of the competition. Of the 23 beers competing for BOS, Seastate finished 10th overall (the BOS winner was a 42-point barrel-aged, stout), which was validation that this beer could be moved from the “experimental” to “completed” folders in the brewing software.

Since this beer enjoyed great success the first time, we brewed it again and used the yeast in the fermentation bucket to start the fermentation of a Baltic Porter, which is still fermenting in the new fermentation chamber as we speak. Seastate is a favorite on the taps at our house, and went over well at a recent tailgate, so this one will be in our permanent lineup.